Core Insight 4: Scattering Modeled as Evolution
“GLS theory proposes: The universe might not be ‘moving,’ but ‘scattering.’”
🎯 Core Idea
In traditional physics, we describe system evolution with differential equations:
But GLS theory proposes a deeper perspective:
GLS theory proposes: System evolution might be essentially a scattering process, and the scattering matrix encodes all dynamical information!
In other words:
In GLS framework: Evolution ⟺ Scattering, Dynamics ⟺ S-Matrix
🏔️ Starting from Valley Echoes: Scattering Reveals Structure
The Valley Echo Analogy
Imagine you shout in a valley:
You emit sound wave → Sound wave hits mountain wall → Reflects back (echo)
By analyzing the echo, you can infer:
- Valley shape (geometry)
- Wall material (absorption/reflection coefficient)
- Valley size (delay time)
graph LR
I["Incident Wave<br/>|in⟩"] --> S["Scattering Region<br/>(Valley, Particle, Black Hole)"]
S --> O["Outgoing Wave<br/>|out⟩"]
S --> R["Reflected Wave<br/>|ref⟩"]
O -.-> |"Analyze"| G["Infer Geometric Structure"]
R -.-> |"Analyze"| G
style I fill:#e1f5ff
style S fill:#fff4e1
style O fill:#ffe1e1
style R fill:#e1ffe1
Scattering in physics is like this:
- Emit particles/waves (input)
- Interact with target (scattering)
- Detect outgoing states (output)
- Infer internal structure from input-output relations!
Why is Scattering So Fundamental?
Because in quantum theory, we can never directly see the “interior”, only:
- Prepare initial state (at past infinity)
- Measure final state (at future infinity)
- The relation between them is the S-matrix!
Key insight:
S-matrix is considered the only observable thing! The “real description” of intermediate processes might be redundant, even misleading!
🌀 S-Matrix: Essence of Evolution
What is S-Matrix?
S-matrix (Scattering matrix) is a unitary operator:
Satisfying:
- Unitarity: (probability conservation)
- Causality: Only connects past asymptotic states with future asymptotic states
- Lorentz covariance: Covariant under relativistic framework
Physical meaning:
S-matrix element is the transition amplitude from initial state to final state .
Scattering cross-section (observable):
S-Matrix Contains All Information
Heisenberg’s S-matrix program (1943) proposed:
“The task of physics is not to describe ‘processes,’ but to calculate S-matrix elements.”
Why?
- Initial and final states are observable (prepared and measured in laboratory)
- Intermediate processes are unobservable (Heisenberg uncertainty principle)
- What is theoretically observable is the S-matrix!
graph TB
subgraph "Observable"
I["Initial State |in⟩<br/>t → -∞"]
O["Final State |out⟩<br/>t → +∞"]
end
subgraph "Unobservable (Black Box)"
P["'Real Process'?<br/>Path Integral?<br/>Field Equation?"]
end
I --> |"S-Matrix"| O
I -.-> |"Interpretation, Not Ontology"| P
P -.-> O
style I fill:#e1f5ff
style O fill:#ffe1e1
style P fill:#f0f0f0,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
⏱️ Wigner-Smith Time Delay Matrix
Group Delay: Time Wave Packet Stays in Scattering Region
Consider a wave packet incident on a scattering region:
Question: How long does it “stay” in the scattering region?
Answer: Given by Wigner-Smith time delay matrix !
Physical meaning:
- Eigenvalues of are time delays of each channel
- is total delay
Key formula (Eisenbud-Wigner formula):
where is the total scattering phase.
Time Delay = Density of States
More remarkably, through Birman-Kreĭn formula:
where is the relative density of states (quantum state density that scattering system has more than free system).
This means:
Time delay is mathematically equivalent to density of states! The system’s “complexity” (how many states) determines the wave packet’s “stay time”!
graph LR
S["Scattering Matrix<br/>S(ω)"] --> |"Frequency Derivative"| Q["Time Delay Matrix<br/>Q(ω) = -iS†∂_ωS"]
Q --> |"Take Trace"| T["Total Delay<br/>τ_W = tr Q"]
T --> |"Birman-Kreĭn"| R["Density of States<br/>ρ_rel = τ_W/2π"]
style S fill:#e1f5ff
style Q fill:#fff4e1
style T fill:#ffe1e1
style R fill:#e1ffe1
🔄 Evolution = Scattering: Unified Perspective
Why Say Evolution is Scattering?
In GLS theory, any physical process might be viewed as scattering:
| Traditional Description | Scattering Description |
|---|---|
| Particle motion | Particle-particle scattering |
| Field evolution | Scattering of field modes |
| Black hole evaporation | Scattering of Hawking radiation |
| Universe expansion | Scattering of conformal modes |
| Quantum measurement | System-apparatus scattering |
Core principle:
As long as there is “input” and “output,” whatever happens in between can theoretically be described by S-matrix!
Deep Meaning of Unitary Evolution
Quantum mechanical evolution operator:
In the limit , , it becomes the S-matrix:
But GLS theory reverses this logic:
GLS theory argues: Maybe not “first have evolution U, then define S,” but “first have S, evolution U is a projection of S at finite time”!
graph TB
S["Fundamental: S-Matrix<br/>(Asymptotic)"] --> |"Finite Time Projection"| U["Evolution Operator<br/>U(t₂,t₁)"]
U --> |"Infinitesimal"| H["Hamiltonian<br/>H = iℏ∂_t U"]
H -.-> |"Traditional Path"| U
U -.-> |"Traditional Path"| S
style S fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
style U fill:#e1f5ff
style H fill:#e1ffe1
🧮 Birman-Kreĭn Formula: Unification of Spectrum, Phase, Delay
This is one of the core mathematical tools of GLS theory.
Birman-Kreĭn formula connects:
- Spectral shift function : Extra spectral weight that scattering system has compared to free system
- Scattering determinant:
- Relative density of states:
Complete formula chain:
This is the mathematical source of the Unified Time Scale Identity!
graph TB
D["Scattering Determinant<br/>det S(ω)"] --> |"Take Logarithm"| P["Total Phase<br/>Φ(ω) = -i ln det S"]
P --> |"Derivative w.r.t. Frequency"| Pp["Phase Derivative<br/>Φ'(ω)"]
D --> |"BK Formula"| X["Spectral Shift Function<br/>ξ(ω)"]
X --> |"Derivative"| Xp["Relative Density of States<br/>ρ_rel = -ξ'"]
Pp --> |"÷ π"| U["Unified Scale<br/>Φ'/π"]
Xp --> U
Q["Time Delay<br/>tr Q(ω)/2π"] --> U
style D fill:#e1f5ff
style U fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
🌌 Universe as Scattering Matrix
The Entire Universe is an S-Matrix!
In GLS’s matrix universe framework (which we will detail later), there is an amazing proposition:
GLS theory hypothesizes: The ontology of the universe might be a huge family of scattering matrices !
- Each frequency corresponds to a unitary matrix
- All spacetime, gravity, particles are “emergences” of this matrix
- Evolution is the “flow” of the matrix
THE-MATRIX might not be science fiction, but a mathematical reality!
Causal Network = Scattering Network
In the language of causal structure:
- Each small causal diamond has an associated scattering matrix
- Diamond evolution is guaranteed by unitarity of
- Markov property of diamond chains is guaranteed by locality of scattering
Causal propagation ⟺ Scattering propagation!
graph LR
D1["D₁<br/>S₁(ω)"] --> |"Scattering Evolution"| D2["D₂<br/>S₂(ω)"]
D2 --> D3["D₃<br/>S₃(ω)"]
D3 --> D4["D₄<br/>S₄(ω)"]
style D1 fill:#e1f5ff
style D2 fill:#fff4e1
style D3 fill:#ffe1e1
style D4 fill:#e1ffe1
🔬 Experimental Verifiability
The beauty of scattering theory is: It is theoretically directly observable!
Experiment 1: Wigner-Smith Delay in Mesoscopic Conductors
In quantum dots, mesoscopic rings, etc., we can directly measure:
- Multi-port scattering matrix (using vector network analyzer)
- Time delay matrix (from frequency derivative of )
- Verification: (through density of states measurement)
Experiment 2: Shapiro Gravitational Time Delay
Delay of radar signal passing near the Sun:
This is the group delay of gravitational scattering!
Can be reinterpreted using framework: Gravitational field is a scattering potential, Shapiro delay is !
Experiment 3: Cosmological Redshift as Phase Rhythm
Redshift in FRW universe:
Can be rewritten as phase rhythm ratio:
Redshift can be interpreted as the phase evolution of cosmic scattering matrix!
🔗 Connections to Other Core Ideas
- Time is Geometry: Time scale is derived from
- Causality is Partial Order: Scattering preserves causal order (S only connects past with future)
- Boundary is Reality: S-matrix is defined on boundary asymptotic states
- Entropy is Arrow: Scattering process entropy monotonically increases (unitarity + coarse-graining)
🎓 Further Reading
To understand more technical details, you can read:
- Theory document: unified-time-scale-geometry.md
- Boundary framework: boundary-time-geometry-unified-framework.md
- Previous: 03-boundary-is-reality_en.md - Boundary is Reality
- Next: 05-entropy-is-arrow_en.md - Entropy is Arrow
🤔 Questions for Reflection
- Why do we say “intermediate processes” are unobservable? What properties of quantum mechanics lead to this?
- Why is Wigner-Smith matrix defined as rather than other forms?
- If the universe is an S-matrix, what does “time evolution” mean?
- What is the relationship between unitarity of scattering and probability conservation?
- Under what conditions does Birman-Kreĭn formula hold? What is the physical meaning of spectral shift function?
📝 Key Formulas Review
Next Step: After understanding “Scattering is Evolution,” we will see “Entropy is Arrow”—time’s directionality comes from entropy increase, which is closely connected with causality, scattering, and boundary!