First-Order Variation: From Entropy to Einstein’s Equations
“When entropy takes an extremum, Einstein’s equations naturally emerge.”
🎯 Goal
We now have all the tools:
- Generalized entropy:
- Small causal diamond: Stage for variation
- Raychaudhuri equation:
Now, let’s complete the core derivation of IGVP:
📐 Variation Setup
Basic Variation
On the small causal diamond , generalized entropy is:
Constraints:
- Fixed endpoints: and unchanged
- Fixed volume:
- Fixed temperature: (at first-order level)
Variation functional:
IGVP principle:
graph TB
S["Generalized Entropy<br/>S_gen = A/4Gℏ + S_out"] --> V["Variation (Fixed Volume)<br/>δS_gen"]
V --> G["Geometric Contribution<br/>δA/4Gℏ"]
V --> Q["Quantum Contribution<br/>δS_out"]
G --> R["Raychaudhuri Equation<br/>δA ~ -∫ λR_kk dλ dA"]
Q --> M["Modular Theory<br/>δS_out ~ ∫ λT_kk dλ dA"]
R --> E["Variation Zero<br/>δS_gen = 0"]
M --> E
E --> F["Family Constraint<br/>∫ λ(R_kk - 8πGT_kk) = o(ℓ²)"]
style S fill:#e1f5ff
style E fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
style F fill:#e1ffe1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:2px
🔧 Calculation of Area Variation
From Raychaudhuri to Area
Recall the integral form of Raychaudhuri equation (derived in previous article):
Where:
- : waist
- : affine parameter along null geodesics
- : upper limit
- : area element of waist
- : higher-order contributions from shear and expansion
Key insight: Area change is directly related to the integral of curvature along null direction!
Error Control
In the small diamond limit , error term is:
Where is a geometric constant.
Key points:
- Main term proportional to (area scale)
- Error is (third-order small quantity)
⚛️ Quantum Field Entropy Variation
Result from Modular Theory
Under Hadamard state and approximate KMS conditions, quantum field entropy variation satisfies the first law:
Where:
- : modular Hamiltonian
- : Unruh temperature
- : surface gravity of approximate Killing field
Localization of Modular Hamiltonian
On the small causal diamond, modular Hamiltonian can be localized as:
Where:
- : component of stress tensor along null direction
- Weight : from Rindler geometry
Physical meaning: Modular Hamiltonian is a weighted integral of stress tensor near causal horizon!
graph LR
K["Modular Hamiltonian<br/>K_χ"] --> T["Stress Tensor Integral<br/>∫ λT_kk dλ dA"]
T --> S["Entropy Variation<br/>δS_out = δK_χ/T"]
S --> F["First Law<br/>δS_out ~ ∫ λT_kk dλ dA"]
style K fill:#e1f5ff
style F fill:#ffe1e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:2px
Variation Formula
Therefore:
Or simply:
Where is the “heat” change.
⚖️ Combining Variations: Family Constraint
First-Order Extremum Condition
Combining the two terms:
Substituting explicit expressions:
Simplification (units , ):
This is the family constraint!
Meaning of Family Constraint
For all small causal diamonds (when is sufficiently small), the above integral is .
Question: How to derive the pointwise equation holding at each point from this integral condition (holding for a family of diamonds)?
Answer: Radon-type closure!
graph TB
F["Family Constraint<br/>∀ Small Diamonds: ∫ λ(R_kk - 8πGT_kk) = o(ℓ²)"] --> L["Localization<br/>Test Function φ ∈ C_c^∞(S_ℓ)"]
L --> R["Weighted Ray Transform<br/>ℒ_λ[f](p,k̂) = ∫ λf dλ"]
R --> I["Local Invertibility<br/>ℒ_λ[f] = 0 ⇒ f(p) = 0"]
I --> P["Pointwise Equation<br/>R_kk = 8πGT_kk"]
style F fill:#e1f5ff
style R fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:2px
style P fill:#e1ffe1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
🔬 Radon-Type Closure: From Family to Point
Weighted Ray Transform
For function , define weighted ray transform:
Where is the null geodesic from along direction .
Physical meaning: Weighted average along light ray, weight (dual to Rindler temperature).
Small Domain Expansion
In small diamond, Taylor expansion:
Key: Leading term is proportional to !
Inverse problem: If holds for all directions , can we derive ?
Local Invertibility Theorem
Theorem (Local invertibility of null geodesic first moment):
In the normal neighborhood of , if:
- No conjugate points
- Null geodesic bundle transverse space is smooth
Then weighted ray transform is locally invertible at point :
Proof idea:
- Use Fubini theorem to separate space and “time” directions
- Approximate Dirac function with mollifier
- At small scales, ray transform is similar to first moment of Radon transform
- First moment data is sufficient to reconstruct value of at point
Application to Family Constraint
Take , family constraint tells us:
Holds for all test functions .
Localization lemma guarantees this is equivalent to:
By local invertibility:
Conclusion:
This is the null-direction Einstein equation!
🎯 Tensorization: From Null Direction to Complete Equation
Null Cone Characterization Lemma
Lemma (requires ):
Let be a smooth symmetric tensor. If for all null vectors :
Then necessarily:
Where is some scalar function.
Proof idea:
- In dimensions, null cone spans entire tangent space
- Any symmetric tensor can be decomposed into trace and traceless parts
- Null cone constraint completely determines traceless part to be zero
Note: When , this lemma does not hold, Einstein equations degenerate!
Applying Bianchi Identity
Define:
We have proven for all , so:
Using Bianchi identity:
Using energy-momentum conservation:
Therefore:
But from :
Comparing the two:
That is:
Therefore is constant, denoted :
Einstein Equations
Substituting back :
Rearranging:
That is:
This is Einstein’s field equations with cosmological constant!
graph TB
Z["Null-Direction Equation<br/>R_kk = 8πGT_kk ∀k"] --> L["Null Cone Characterization Lemma<br/>X_ab = Φg_ab"]
L --> B["Bianchi Identity<br/>∇^a R_ab = ½∇_b R"]
L --> C["Energy Conservation<br/>∇^a T_ab = 0"]
B --> N["Derivative Constraint<br/>∇_b(Φ - ½R) = 0"]
C --> N
N --> LA["Cosmological Constant<br/>Λ := ½R - Φ"]
LA --> E["Einstein Equations<br/>G_ab + Λg_ab = 8πGT_ab"]
style Z fill:#e1f5ff
style L fill:#fff4e1
style E fill:#e1ffe1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
🌟 Complete Derivation Chain Summary
Let’s review the entire derivation process:
Step 1: Define Generalized Entropy
Step 2: Variation Setup
On small causal diamond, fix volume, set .
Step 3: Calculate Area Variation
Using Raychaudhuri equation:
Step 4: Calculate Field Entropy Variation
Using modular theory:
Step 5: Family Constraint
Combining:
Step 6: Radon-Type Closure
Using local invertibility of weighted ray transform:
Step 7: Tensorization
Using null cone characterization lemma + Bianchi identity:
Complete!
graph TB
S1["Step 1: Generalized Entropy<br/>S_gen = A/4Gℏ + S_out"] --> S2["Step 2: Variation Principle<br/>δS_gen = 0 (Fixed V)"]
S2 --> S3["Step 3: Raychaudhuri<br/>δA ~ -∫ λR_kk dλ dA"]
S2 --> S4["Step 4: Modular Theory<br/>δS_out ~ ∫ λT_kk dλ dA"]
S3 --> S5["Step 5: Family Constraint<br/>∫ λ(R_kk - 8πGT_kk) = o(ℓ²)"]
S4 --> S5
S5 --> S6["Step 6: Radon Closure<br/>R_kk = 8πGT_kk ∀k"]
S6 --> S7["Step 7: Null Cone Characterization<br/>R_ab - 8πGT_ab = Φg_ab"]
S7 --> S8["Step 8: Bianchi<br/>∇_b(Φ - ½R) = 0"]
S8 --> S9["Step 9: Einstein Equations<br/>G_ab + Λg_ab = 8πGT_ab"]
style S1 fill:#e1f5ff
style S5 fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:2px
style S6 fill:#ffe1e1
style S9 fill:#e1ffe1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
💡 Physical Insights
Entropy is Fundamental
Traditional perspective: Einstein equations are fundamental axioms → black hole entropy is derived result
IGVP perspective: Generalized entropy is fundamental functional → Einstein equations are variation result
Gravity as a Thermodynamic Phenomenon
Einstein’s equations in this framework can be understood as:
This is similar to a thermal equilibrium condition.
Manifestation of Locality
Deriving pointwise field equations from local entropy extremum (small causal diamond) highlights the local nature of gravity.
Emergence of Cosmological Constant
is not assumed beforehand in this derivation, but naturally emerges as an integration constant from the variation process.
Its physical meaning can be interpreted as the dual variable of the volume constraint.
📝 Key Formulas Quick Reference
| Step | Formula | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Area variation | Raychaudhuri | |
| Field entropy variation | Modular theory | |
| Family constraint | IGVP | |
| Pointwise equation | Radon closure | |
| Tensorization | Null cone characterization | |
| Einstein | Bianchi |
🎓 Further Reading
- Jacobson’s original derivation: T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of spacetime” (1995)
- Radon transform: S. Helgason, The Radon Transform (Birkhäuser, 1999)
- GLS complete proof: igvp-einstein-complete.md
- Previous: 03-raychaudhuri-equation_en.md - Raychaudhuri Equation
- Next: 05-second-order-variation_en.md - Second-Order Variation and Stability
🤔 Exercises
-
Conceptual understanding:
- Why is the weight in family constraint rather than constant?
- What does “local invertibility” of Radon-type closure mean?
- Why does null cone characterization lemma require ?
-
Derivation exercises:
- Verify that implies
- Derive from Bianchi identity
- Check units of cosmological constant when
-
Physical applications:
- If (vacuum), what do Einstein equations become?
- How does Schwarzschild solution satisfy ?
- Why do we say gravity is a “thermodynamic phenomenon”?
-
Advanced thinking:
- If volume is not fixed, what equations would variation yield?
- How to modify IGVP derivation for higher-order gravity theories (e.g., )?
- Can IGVP derive Lovelock equations? (Hint: use Wald entropy)
Next step: First-order variation gives field equations, but how is stability guaranteed? Let’s enter the world of second-order variation!