Geometric Times: Clocks of Spacetime Metric
“Geometric time can be understood as the metric’s projection onto the observer.”
🎯 Core Proposition
In general relativity, “time” has multiple geometric realizations. In the GLS theoretical framework, they are classified as the unified time scale equivalence class :
| Time Type | Definition | Applicable Scenarios |
|---|---|---|
| Killing Time | is a Killing vector | Static spacetimes |
| ADM Lapse | decomposition | |
| Null Affine Parameter | Null geodesics | |
| Conformal Time | FRW universe |
Theoretical Proposition: Under appropriate conditions, these times are related to each other through affine transformations:
Thus mathematically belonging to the same equivalence class .
graph TB
T["Unified Time Scale<br/>[τ]"] --> K["Killing Time<br/>t_K"]
T --> A["ADM Time<br/>N·t"]
T --> L["null parameter<br/>λ"]
T --> E["Conformal Time<br/>η"]
T --> M["Modular Time<br/>s_mod"]
K -.->|"affine transformation"| A
A -.->|"affine transformation"| L
L -.->|"affine transformation"| E
style T fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:4px
💡 Intuitive Image: Rhythms of Different Clocks
Analogy: Multiple Clocks
Imagine a scenario:
- Ground Clock: Second hand rotates uniformly (Killing time)
- Mountain Clock: Faster at higher altitudes (ADM lapse)
- Photon Clock: Massless, moves infinitely fast (null parameter)
- Cosmic Clock: Slows down with cosmic expansion (conformal time)
They all serve as measures of time, but with different rhythms.
GLS Theory proposes: These clocks are related by simple rescaling, potentially pointing to the same underlying time concept.
📐 Four Geometric Times Explained
1. Killing Time (Static Spacetimes)
Definition:
In static spacetimes, there exists a Killing vector :
That is, the metric is invariant along .
Time Coordinate: Choose a coordinate system such that , then:
where (timelike).
Proper Time Relation:
For a stationary observer (), the proper time:
Physical Meaning:
- describes the “time dilation factor”
- Where the gravitational field is strong ( small), time runs slow
- Redshift Formula:
Example: Schwarzschild Metric
, for a stationary observer:
At the horizon : (time freezes)
graph LR
K["Killing Vector<br/>ξ^μ"] --> G["Metric Invariant<br/>£_ξ g = 0"]
G --> V["Time Dilation<br/>V = -g_tt"]
V --> TAU["Proper Time<br/>dτ = √V dt"]
TAU --> RED["Gravitational Redshift<br/>ν ∝ √V"]
style K fill:#e1f5ff
style V fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
style RED fill:#e1ffe1
2. ADM Lapse ( Decomposition)
ADM Decomposition:
Decompose 4-dimensional spacetime into 3-dimensional space + 1-dimensional time:
where:
- : lapse function (ratio of coordinate time to proper time)
- : shift vector (coordinate system drift)
- : spatial 3-metric
Orthogonal Observer:
For an observer along the slice normal ():
Physical Meaning:
- controls the “time flow rate”
- : coordinate time faster than proper time
- : coordinate time slower than proper time
ADM Equations:
Einstein’s equations can be written as constraint equations + evolution equations:
Constraints (Hamiltonian + Momentum):
Evolution:
where is the extrinsic curvature.
Relation to Killing Time:
In static spacetimes, , they are equivalent.
graph TB
ADM["ADM Decomposition<br/>(3+1)"] --> L["lapse function<br/>N"]
ADM --> S["shift vector<br/>N^i"]
ADM --> H["spatial metric<br/>h_ij"]
L --> TAU["Proper Time<br/>dτ = N dt"]
TAU --> CON["Constraint Equations<br/>H = 0"]
H --> EV["Evolution Equations<br/>∂_t h ~ K"]
style ADM fill:#e1f5ff
style L fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
style TAU fill:#e1ffe1
3. Null Affine Parameter (Null Geodesics)
Null Geodesics:
Worldlines of light rays or massless particles, satisfying .
Geodesic Equation:
where is the tangent vector, is the affine parameter.
Why is an Affine Parameter Needed?
For null geodesics, , so we cannot parameterize with , must introduce .
Bondi Coordinates (Schwarzschild exterior):
Tortoise Coordinate:
Retarded Time:
Advanced Time:
Outgoing Null Surface:
Incoming Null Surface:
Physical Meaning:
- are natural “boundary times”
- In gravitational scattering, corresponds to asymptotic outgoing state time
- Bondi mass is monotonically non-increasing along (energy radiation)
Conformal Time in FRW:
Null Geodesics:
In coordinates:
Straightening: Null geodesics appear as straight lines in conformal time.
graph LR
NULL["Null Geodesics<br/>ds² = 0"] --> AFF["Affine Parameter<br/>λ"]
AFF --> BONDI["Bondi Coordinates<br/>u = t - r*"]
AFF --> CONF["Conformal Time<br/>η = ∫dt/a"]
BONDI --> MASS["Bondi Mass<br/>M(u)↓"]
CONF --> STRAIGHT["Straightening<br/>dη² = dχ²"]
style NULL fill:#e1f5ff
style AFF fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
style BONDI fill:#ffe1e1
style CONF fill:#e1ffe1
4. Conformal Time (FRW Universe)
FRW Metric:
where is the scale factor, is the unit 3-sphere/plane/hyperboloid metric.
Conformal Time Definition:
Integrating:
Metric Rewritten:
Physical Meaning:
- Null geodesics are straight lines in coordinates
- Comoving observer: (proper time = cosmic time)
- Particle horizon: corresponds to the visible universe boundary
Redshift-Time Relation:
For photons, :
Phase Rhythm Ratio (Chapter 1):
Cosmological redshift can be viewed as a global rescaling of the time scale.
graph TB
FRW["FRW Metric<br/>ds² = -dt² + a²dΣ²"] --> A["Scale Factor<br/>a(t)"]
FRW --> ETA["Conformal Time<br/>dη = dt/a"]
ETA --> STRAIGHT["Straighten Null Geodesics<br/>dη² = dχ²"]
A --> Z["Redshift<br/>1+z = a₀/a_e"]
Z --> PHASE["Phase Rhythm Ratio<br/>(dφ/dt)_e / (dφ/dt)₀"]
style FRW fill:#e1f5ff
style ETA fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px
style Z fill:#ffe1e1
style PHASE fill:#e1ffe1
🔑 Unification of Time Equivalence Classes
Theoretical Proposition: Under appropriate conditions, the following time parameters belong to the same equivalence class:
Related to each other through affine transformations .
Proof Outline:
-
Killing ↔ ADM: In static spacetimes, ,
-
ADM ↔ null: The normal to ADM slices defines ,
-
null ↔ conformal: In FRW, straightens null geodesics,
-
conformal ↔ redshift: (with appropriate normalization)
All these transformations are affine.
graph TB
KILLING["Killing Time<br/>dτ = √V dt"] --> ADM["ADM Time<br/>dτ = N dt"]
ADM --> NULL["null parameter<br/>k^a∇_a k^b = 0"]
NULL --> CONF["Conformal Time<br/>dη = dt/a"]
CONF --> Z["Redshift<br/>1+z = a₀/a_e"]
KILLING -.->|"N = √V"| ADM
ADM -.->|"dλ ∝ N dt"| NULL
NULL -.->|"straightening"| CONF
CONF -.->|"scale factor"| Z
ALL["Time Equivalence Class<br/>[T]"] --> KILLING
ALL --> ADM
ALL --> NULL
ALL --> CONF
ALL --> Z
style ALL fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:4px
📊 Connection to Unified Time Scale
Core Connection: Geometric times connect to the unified scale through the proper time-phase relation (Chapter 1):
Various Geometric Times:
-
Killing Time:
-
ADM Time:
-
Conformal Time: (comoving observer)
Theoretically, they should give the same phase (along the same worldline).
Connection to Time Scale Identity:
Geometric Interpretation: is the “local time density,” integrating it gives any geometric time.
🤔 Exercises
-
Conceptual Understanding:
- What is the difference between Killing time and ADM time?
- Why is a null affine parameter necessary?
- How does conformal time straighten null geodesics?
-
Calculation Exercises:
- Schwarzschild metric: Calculate at
- ADM decomposition: Prove (static case)
- FRW universe: Calculate for matter-dominated era
-
Physical Applications:
- Which geometric times are involved in GPS satellite time corrections?
- How does Bondi mass evolve with ?
- What is the relationship between cosmological horizon and ?
-
Advanced Thinking:
- Can we define a global Killing time in non-static spacetimes?
- What is the relationship between ADM energy conservation and time translation invariance?
- What physical process corresponds to conformal time singularities?
Navigation:
- Previous: 04-time-scale-identity_en.md - Time Scale Identity
- Next: 06-modular-time_en.md - Modular Time
- Overview: 00-time-overview_en.md - Unified Time Overview
- GLS theory: unified-time-scale-geometry.md