Boundary Observers: Unified Measurement Perspective

“All observers can theoretically be viewed as boundary observers.”

🎯 Core Insight

This article will reveal a profound fact:

No matter where you are, you can theoretically be modeled as a “boundary observer”!

graph TB
    OBS["Observer"] --> Q1["Where Are You?"]
    Q1 --> ANS1["On Some Boundary!"]

    OBS --> Q2["What Do You Measure?"]
    Q2 --> ANS2["Boundary Observables!"]

    OBS --> Q3["How Do You Measure Time?"]
    Q3 --> ANS3["Boundary Time Scale!"]

    ANS1 -.->|"Unify"| BOUNDARY["Boundary Observer"]
    ANS2 -.->|"Unify"| BOUNDARY
    ANS3 -.->|"Unify"| BOUNDARY

    style BOUNDARY fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:4px

💡 Intuitive Image: Observer’s Situation

Analogy: Trapped in a Room

Imagine you’re in a room:

What Can You Do?

• Touch walls (boundary)
• See light reflected from walls (scattering)
• Feel temperature of walls (thermal state)
• Hear sounds from walls (waves)

What Can’t You Do?

• See through walls outside (beyond causal horizon)
• Instantly know all corners (non-locality)
• Exist without walls (observer must be on boundary)

graph LR
    YOU["You<br/>Observer"] --> WALL["Wall<br/>Boundary"]
    WALL --> INFO["Information"]

    INFO --> LIGHT["Light<br/>Scattering"]
    INFO --> SOUND["Sound<br/>Waves"]
    INFO --> HEAT["Heat<br/>Temperature"]

    style YOU fill:#e1f5ff
    style WALL fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:2px

Key Realization:

• You’re always in some “room” (causal region)
• “Walls” of room are boundary
• All information comes from walls
• You can be viewed as a boundary observer!

🌟 Three Types of Boundary Observers

In GLS theory, there are three equivalent boundary observer perspectives:

1. Scattering Observer

Location: Asymptotic boundary ${\mathcal{I}}^{\pm }$ of spacetime

Measurements:

• Incoming particle states: $|\mathrm{in}⟩$
• Outgoing particle states: $|\mathrm{out}⟩$
• Scattering matrix: $S:|\mathrm{in}⟩\mapsto |\mathrm{out}⟩$

Time Scale:

$${\kappa }_{\mathrm{scatt}}(\omega )=\frac{{\phi }^{\prime }(\omega )}{\pi }=\frac{1}{2\pi }\mathrm{tr}Q(\omega )$$

where $Q(\omega )$ is Wigner-Smith group delay operator.

graph TB
    SCATTER["Scattering Observer"] --> POS1["Location<br/>Asymptotic Boundary I±"]
    SCATTER --> MEAS1["Measurement<br/>S-Matrix"]
    SCATTER --> TIME1["Time<br/>tr Q/(2π)"]

    MEAS1 --> EXAMPLE1["Example<br/>Particle Accelerator"]

    style SCATTER fill:#e1f5ff,stroke:#0066cc,stroke-width:2px

Experimental Examples:

• High-Energy Physics Experiments: Particle accelerators, detectors far away
• Quantum Scattering Experiments: Atomic scattering, measuring angular distributions
• Astronomical Observations: We on Earth, observing cosmic boundary (CMB)

2. Modular Flow Observer

Location: Boundary $\partial O$ of causal region $O$

Measurements:

• Regional algebra: $\mathcal{A}(O)$
• Modular flow: ${\sigma }_t^{\omega }(A)={\Delta }_{\omega }^{it}A{\Delta }_{\omega }^{-it}$
• Relative entropy: $S(\rho \Vert \omega )$

Time Scale:

$${\kappa }_{\mathrm{mod}}(\lambda )=\frac{\mathrm{d}\lambda }{\mathrm{d}t}{|}_{\text{modular}}$$

where $\lambda$ is spectral parameter of modular Hamiltonian $K_{\omega }$.

graph TB
    MOD["Modular Flow Observer"] --> POS2["Location<br/>Regional Boundary ∂O"]
    MOD --> MEAS2["Measurement<br/>Regional Algebra"]
    MOD --> TIME2["Time<br/>Modular Flow Parameter"]

    MEAS2 --> EXAMPLE2["Example<br/>Accelerating Observer (Rindler)"]

    style MOD fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:2px

Experimental Examples:

• Rindler Observer: Uniformly accelerating observer, horizon is Rindler horizon
• Observer Outside Black Hole: Region outside horizon, horizon is boundary
• de Sitter Observer: Observer inside cosmological horizon

3. Geometric Observer

Location: Timelike boundary $\mathcal{B}$

Measurements:

• Induced metric: $h_{ab}$
• Extrinsic curvature: $K_{ab}$
• Brown-York energy: $E_{\mathrm{BY}}$

Time Scale:

$${\kappa }_{\mathrm{geom}}=\frac{\delta E_{\mathrm{BY}}}{\delta T}{|}_{\text{boundary}}$$

where $T$ is boundary time parameter.

graph TB
    GEOM["Geometric Observer"] --> POS3["Location<br/>Timelike Boundary B"]
    GEOM --> MEAS3["Measurement<br/>Metric and Curvature"]
    GEOM --> TIME3["Time<br/>BY Energy Generator"]

    MEAS3 --> EXAMPLE3["Example<br/>GPS Satellite"]

    style GEOM fill:#e1ffe1,stroke:#00cc00,stroke-width:2px

Experimental Examples:

• GPS System: Satellites measure Earth’s gravitational field, boundary at satellite orbit
• Gravitational Wave Detection: LIGO measures spacetime geometry changes
• Cosmological Observations: Hubble observations, boundary is observable universe

🔗 Equivalence of Three Observers

Core Theorem

Proposition (Boundary Observer Unification):

Under appropriate matching conditions, three boundary observers are considered to measure the same physics:

$$\boxed{{\kappa }_{\mathrm{scatt}}\sim {\kappa }_{\mathrm{mod}}\sim {\kappa }_{\mathrm{geom}}}$$

That is, their time scales belong to the same equivalence class $[\kappa ]$!

graph TB
    UNITY["Unified Time Scale<br/>[κ]"] --> SCATTER["Scattering Observer<br/>κ_scatt"]
    UNITY --> MOD["Modular Flow Observer<br/>κ_mod"]
    UNITY --> GEOM["Geometric Observer<br/>κ_geom"]

    SCATTER -.->|"Equivalent"| MOD
    MOD -.->|"Equivalent"| GEOM
    GEOM -.->|"Equivalent"| SCATTER

    style UNITY fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:4px

Matching Conditions

Condition 1: Matching of Scattering and Modular Flow

In asymptotic region, scattering channels can be embedded in boundary algebra:

$${\mathcal{A}}_{\mathrm{scatt}}\hookrightarrow {\mathcal{A}}_{\partial }$$

Scattering phase matches spectral phase of modular Hamiltonian:

$$\phi (\omega )\leftrightarrow \arg \det \left(\mathbb{I}+e^{-\beta K_{\omega }}\right)$$

Condition 2: Matching of Modular Flow and Geometry

Through semiclassical approximation or holographic duality:

$$⟨T_{\mu \nu }{⟩}_{\omega }\leftrightarrow \frac{\delta S_{\mathrm{grav}}}{\delta g^{\mu \nu }}$$

Modular Hamiltonian relates to Brown-York energy:

$$K_{\omega }\leftrightarrow 2\pi {\beta }^{-1}{H}_{\mathrm{BY}}$$

Condition 3: Closure of Geometry and Scattering

Through Shapiro delay, gravitational scattering, etc.:

$$\text{Scattering Delay}\leftrightarrow \text{Geometric Path Delay}$$

📊 Comparison of Three Observers

Unified Formula:

$$\kappa (\omega )=\frac{{\phi }^{\prime }(\omega )}{\pi }={\rho }_{\mathrm{mod}}(\lambda )=\frac{\partial E_{\mathrm{BY}}}{\partial t_{\mathcal{B}}}$$

🌌 Rindler Observer: Perfect Example of Trinity

Setup

Rindler Wedge: Accelerating reference frame in Minkowski spacetime

$$W=\{(t,x,y,z):|t|<x\}$$

Rindler Coordinates:

$$t=\rho \sinh \tau ,x=\rho \cosh \tau$$

Metric:

$$\mathrm{d}{s}^2=-{\rho }^2\mathrm{d}{\tau }^2+\mathrm{d}{\rho }^2+\mathrm{d}{y}^2+\mathrm{d}{z}^2$$

Horizon: $x=|t|$ (null surface)

graph TB
    RINDLER["Rindler Wedge<br/>W: |t| < x"] --> HORIZON["Horizon<br/>x = |t|"]
    RINDLER --> ACCEL["Uniform Acceleration<br/>a = 1/ρ"]

    HORIZON --> NULL["Null Boundary"]
    ACCEL --> OBS["Rindler Observer"]

    style RINDLER fill:#e1f5ff
    style HORIZON fill:#ffe1e1

As Scattering Observer

Scattering Setup:

• Incoming: from $I^{-}$ into Rindler wedge
• Outgoing: from Rindler wedge to $I^{+}$
• Horizon as “scattering center”

Bogoliubov Transformation:

$$a_{\mathrm{R}}=\cosh r{a}_{\mathrm{M}}-\sinh r{b}_{\mathrm{M}}^{†}$$

Scattering matrix elements contain $\tanh r=e^{-\pi \omega /a}$, where $a$ is proper acceleration.

As Modular Flow Observer

Bisognano-Wichmann Theorem:

Modular flow of Minkowski vacuum $|0_{\mathrm{M}}⟩$ restricted to $\mathcal{A}(W)$ is:

$${\sigma }_s^{{\omega }_0}(A)=U_{\mathrm{boost}}(2\pi s)A{U}_{\mathrm{boost}}^{-1}(2\pi s)$$

That is, boost along Rindler horizon!

Modular Hamiltonian:

$$K_W=2\pi {\int }_{\partial W}{\xi }^{\mu }{T}_{\mu \nu }{n}^{\nu }\mathrm{d}\Sigma$$

where $\xi ={\partial }_{\tau }$ is boost Killing vector.

As Geometric Observer

Boundary Setup:

• Boundary: $\rho ={\rho }_0$ (constant acceleration trajectory)
• Induced metric: $h_{ab}=\mathrm{diag}(-{\rho }_0^2,1,1)$
• Extrinsic curvature: $K=1/{\rho }_0$

Brown-York Energy:

$$E_{\mathrm{BY}}=\frac{1}{8\pi G}{\int }_{\mathcal{S}}\sqrt{\sigma }K{\mathrm{d}}^{2}x\propto {\rho }_0$$

Unruh Temperature:

$$T_{\mathrm{Unruh}}=\frac{a}{2\pi }=\frac{1}{2\pi {\rho }_0}$$

Triple Unification

graph TB
    RINDLER["Rindler Observer"] --> SCATTER["Scattering Perspective"]
    RINDLER --> MOD["Modular Flow Perspective"]
    RINDLER --> GEOM["Geometric Perspective"]

    SCATTER --> TEMP1["Temperature<br/>T ~ e^(-πω/a)"]
    MOD --> TEMP2["Temperature<br/>β = 2π/a"]
    GEOM --> TEMP3["Temperature<br/>T = a/(2π)"]

    TEMP1 -.->|"Same Temperature"| UNITY["Unruh Temperature<br/>T = a/(2π)"]
    TEMP2 -.->|"Same Temperature"| UNITY
    TEMP3 -.->|"Same Temperature"| UNITY

    style UNITY fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px

Conclusion: $$\boxed{T_{\mathrm{scatt}}=T_{\mathrm{mod}}=T_{\mathrm{geom}}=\frac{a}{2\pi }}$$

This is a perfect example of boundary observer unification!

🎯 Observer Dependence vs. Physical Objectivity

Philosophical Question

Question: Different boundary observers see different physics, does this mean physics is “subjective”?

Answer: No! This is similar to velocity in relativity.

Analogy: Relativity

Key Insight:

• Objectivity: Measurements by different observers can be converted (through known transformation rules)
• Covariance: Physical laws invariant in form under transformations
• Invariants: Quantities all observers agree on (like $[\kappa ]$)

graph LR
    OBS1["Observer 1<br/>Scattering"] --> MEAS1["Measurement 1<br/>κ_scatt"]
    OBS2["Observer 2<br/>Modular Flow"] --> MEAS2["Measurement 2<br/>κ_mod"]

    MEAS1 --> TRANS["Transformation"]
    MEAS2 --> TRANS

    TRANS --> INV["Invariant<br/>[κ]"]

    style INV fill:#fff4e1,stroke:#ff6b6b,stroke-width:3px

New Understanding of Physical Objectivity

Traditional View: Physical quantities independent of observer

New View: Physical quantities are relations between observers

Boundary Perspective:

• Different boundary observers are different projections of same physics
• Can convert through matching conditions
• Exist invariant equivalence classes (like $[\kappa ]$)

This is considered not subjectivity, but relational objectivity!

💎 Experimental Verification

1. Unruh Effect (Principle Verification)

Prediction: Accelerating observer measures Minkowski vacuum as thermal bath at temperature $T=a/(2\pi )$

Status: Direct detection difficult (temperature extremely low), but indirect evidence:

• Hawking radiation (analogy)
• Dynamic Casimir effect
• Radiation in circular accelerators

2. Hawking Radiation (Black Hole Horizon)

Prediction: Observer outside black hole horizon measures temperature $T_H=\kappa /(2\pi )$

Status:

• Theory widely accepted
• Analog systems (acoustic black holes) have observed similar effects
• Real astrophysical black hole radiation too weak, not directly detected

3. Cosmological Horizon (de Sitter)

Prediction: Observer in de Sitter universe measures horizon temperature

Status:

• CMB temperature may contain de Sitter contribution
• Precision cosmological observations ongoing

4. Scattering Experiments (High-Energy Physics)

Realization: All accelerator experiments are boundary observations

Verification:

• $S$-matrix unitarity
• Scattering delay measurements (time of flight)
• Consistent with theoretical predictions

🤔 Exercises

1. Conceptual Understanding

Question: Why are “all observers boundary observers”?

Hint: Causality constraints, information propagation takes time, always on some horizon.

2. Calculation Exercise

Question: Calculate Brown-York energy measured by observers at different radii during spherically symmetric collapse forming black hole.

Hint: Use Schwarzschild-like metric, calculate $K$ at different $r$.

3. Physical Application

Question: How do GPS satellites embody “geometric observer”?

Hint: Satellites measure Earth’s gravitational field, need relativistic corrections (boundary time different).

4. Philosophical Reflection

Question: Does boundary observer theory imply “observer creates reality”?

Hint: No, observer chooses projection method, but physical laws objective (covariant).

📝 Chapter Summary

Three Types of Boundary Observers

1. Scattering Observer: At asymptotic boundary ${\mathcal{I}}^{\pm }$, measures $S$-matrix
2. Modular Flow Observer: At regional boundary $\partial O$, measures modular Hamiltonian
3. Geometric Observer: At timelike boundary $\mathcal{B}$, measures Brown-York energy

Core Theorem

Boundary Observer Unification:

$${\kappa }_{\mathrm{scatt}}\sim {\kappa }_{\mathrm{mod}}\sim {\kappa }_{\mathrm{geom}}\in [\kappa ]$$

All observers are considered to share unified time scale equivalence class!

Physical Meaning

• Relationality: Physical quantities are relations between observers, not “absolute existence”
• Covariance: Physical laws invariant in form under observer transformations
• Objectivity: Invariants (like $[\kappa ]$) are agreed upon by all observers

Rindler Paradigm

Rindler observer perfectly demonstrates triple unification:

$$T_{\mathrm{Unruh}}=\frac{a}{2\pi }\text{(Scattering)}=\text{(Modular Flow)}=\text{(Geometric)}$$

Next Step: We’ve completed core content of boundary theory, final article will summarize complete picture!

Navigation:

• Previous: 04-brown-york-energy_en.md
• Next: 06-boundary-summary_en.md
• Overview: 00-boundary-overview_en.md